|
|
Labour Unions in the Bahamas: Closed Shop Laws and Involuntary Membership
Union membership -- including dues payment -- is not voluntary for all
Bahamians. In industries such as education and tourism (hotel workers),
employees are physically coerced by the Bahamas government to pay a part of
their wages to union officials -- even if they do not agree with the union
policies and do not want to join the union. The present legal system puts union
leaders in a position where they do not have to act in the best interests of its
members.
It is through
the power to refrain from paying union dues that the Bahamian laborer
has power over his union leader. By the government making payment
mandatory, the check on the union leader is replaced with a leash on the
laborer.
End Government Created Union Slavery
By Mark Da Cunha (October 1, 2005)
I enjoyed reading Oswald Brown's "The Royal Oasis Saga" -- including
his concise analysis of how the West End economy was destroyed in the
late 80's by coercive union power.
One point worth emphasizing is that the concept of unions should not be
blamed for the West End-Jack Tarr fiasco, but, the legislation -- that
granted union leaders coercive powers that they had no moral right to
possess -- should be held responsible. It was obvious that union leaders
did not act in the best interests of its members -- yet those members
who did not agree with the union -- and who could have put a stop to the
madness -- were silenced by "closed shop" laws, and the mandatory
payment of union dues.
I suggest two policy measures to prevent this catastrophe from happening
again:
1. Union membership -- including dues payment -- should be voluntary
for all Bahamians.
Collective bargaining is an important economic and moral tool in a free
society for individual laborers -- so long as membership is voluntary.
If a Bahamian does not wish to join a union it is immoral for anyone to
force him to pay union dues -- especially if he does not agree with
union policies. This is nothing more than government mandated slavery.
The only beneficiaries of such a setup -- where Bahamians are forced
against their will to pay $10 to the union leader -- are the union
leaders and the politicians. The loser in this "arranged marriage" is
the Bahamian laborer (and employer).
It is through the power to refrain from paying union dues that the
Bahamian laborer has power over his union leader. By the government
making payment mandatory, the check on the union leader is replaced with
a leash on the laborer.
2. Bahamians should be free to form their own (competing) unions
without begging for government permission, i.e., there should be no
government created union monopolies.
With the implementation of the first proposal, union leaders will have
to work for their member's interests rather then taking such dues for
granted -- that is, if they wish to keep their members (and their
mammoth six figure salaries).
Furthermore, with the implementation of the second proposal it will be
easy for Bahamians unhappy with their present union to form their own
union, in line with their own personal economic, political, and moral
beliefs.
All Bahamian citizens have the inalienable right to form a union, just
as any Bahamian has the moral right to form a business partnership or
get married. Such a right belongs to the individual, and not to the
state. It is time the government start protecting that right, as opposed
to passing legislation that violates it. It is time to take the power
away from union leaders and politicians, and give it back to where it
belongs: individual laborers.
Reprinted by Permission of
FreedomBahamas.com |
|
Talk, ask questions, and discuss the Bahamas for free on our online Bahamas
Discussion Boards. |
Opportunity to win great vacation prizes. Learn more
about The Bahamas
Guide Sweepstakes! |
Get the inside scoop on the latest deals, breaking news, and security alerts
by signing up for our email newsletter. |
|
|